|
Challenge ID |
OTM:048 |
||||
1 |
Title |
Identifying munitions debris (UXO, mines, etc.) |
||||
2 |
Theme ID |
ON 1.2: Seismic Planning - Identification of adverse terrain for trafficability |
||||
3 |
Originator of Challenge |
Onshore: OTM |
||||
4 |
Challenge Reviewer / initiator |
PetroSA, Exxon, Tullow, Petronas |
||||
|
General description |
Overview of Challenge |
||||
5 |
What is the nature of the challenge? (What is not adequately addressed at present?) |
Where there has been a history of conflict, the presence of munitions or munitions debris can trouble operations. Identification of munitions debris and its migration patterns would be useful to ensure use of complimentary clearance resources. |
||||
6 |
Thematic information requirements |
8. Identify the presence of UXO, |
||||
7 |
Nature of the challenge - What effect does this challenge have on operations? |
Identification of munitions debris in a survey area will cause operations to cease until the munitions debris is cleared. This can cause unforeseen delays, costs and a health and safety risk to our staff. |
||||
8 |
What do you currently do to address this challenge?/ How is this challenge conventionally addressed? |
Scouting team, military maps |
||||
9 |
What kind of solution do you envisage could address this challenge? |
We currently look for disturbed ground |
||||
10 |
What is your view on the capability of technology to meet this need? – are you currently using EO tech? If not, why not? |
No applicable EO solution is considered available at present |
||||
|
Challenge classification |
|
||||
11 |
Lifecycle stage |
Pre license |
Exp. |
Dev. |
Prod. |
Decom. |
Score from impact quantification [1] |
3 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
|
12 |
Climate classification |
NOT CLIMATE SPECIFIC |
||||
13 |
Geographic context/restrictions |
Generic onshore (Unspecified) |
||||
14 |
Topographic classification / Offshore classification |
Generic onshore (Unspecified) |
||||
15 |
Seasonal variations |
Any season |
||||
16 |
Impact Area |
Health and Safety |
||||
17 |
Technology Urgency (How quickly does the user need the solution) |
Immediately (0-2 years) |
||||
|
Information requirements |
|
||||
18 |
Update frequency |
Snap shot requirement |
||||
19 |
Data Currently used |
|
||||
20 |
Spatial resolution |
|
||||
21 |
Thematic accuracy |
|
||||
22 |
Example formats |
|
||||
23 |
Timeliness |
Reference data - timeliness not important |
||||
24 |
Geographic Extent |
district area |
||||
25 |
Existing standards |
|
[1] Impact quantification scores: 4 – Critical/ enabling; 3 – Significant/ competitive advantage; 2 – Important but non-essential; 1 – Nice to have; 0 – No impact, need satisfied with existing technology