CLS_OFF.2.7 : Monitoring water discharge/drill cuttings
1 |
Challenge ID |
CLS_OFF.2.7 |
|||||
2 |
Title |
Monitoring water discharge/drill cuttings |
|||||
3 |
Originator of Challenge |
STATOIL |
|||||
|
General description |
|
|||||
4 |
What data/products do you currently use? |
mainly SAR images are used for observing water discharge/drill cuttings |
|||||
5 |
When do you use this kind of dataset? |
This is an assessment needed as part of the drilling permit process. |
|||||
6 |
What are your actual limitations and do you have a work around? |
n/a |
|||||
7 |
Needs and expectations on EO data |
It could be useful to see processed water by SAR images and to have a better coverage at low latitude. SAR: • Synoptic (every 6 hours) observations • Multi-band observations |
|||||
|
Challenge classification |
|
|||||
8
|
Lifecycle stage |
Pre license |
Exp. |
Dev. |
Prod. |
Decom. |
|
Score from impact |
|
4 |
|
|
|
||
9 |
Geographic context/restrictions |
Main region of interest:
No need for location on China. |
|||||
10 |
Topographic classification / Offshore classification |
n/a |
|||||
11 |
Activity impacted/concerned |
n/a |
|||||
12 |
Urgency (How quickly does the user need the solution) |
mid-term (5-10 years), for SAR dual frequency; |
|||||
|
Information requirements |
|
|||||
13 |
Update frequency |
daily |
|||||
14 |
Temporal resolution |
hourly |
|||||
15 |
Spatial resolution |
n/a |
|||||
16 |
Data quality |
n/a |
|||||
17 |
Data Coverage and extent |
n/a |
|||||
18 |
Example formats |
n/a |
|||||
19 |
Timeliness |
Once a day |
|||||
20 |
Existing standards |
n/a |
|||||