Land use mapping to detect the social impact of O&G developments
|
Challenge ID |
OTM:028 |
||||
1 |
Title |
Land use mapping to detect the social impact of O&G developments |
||||
2 |
Theme ID |
ON 4.2: Environmental monitoring - Continuous monitoring of changes throughout the lifecycle |
||||
3 |
Originator of Challenge |
Onshore: OTM |
||||
4 |
Challenge Reviewer / initiator |
PEMEX, Statoil, Shell, Sasol, Tullow, Petronas |
||||
|
General description |
Overview of Challenge |
||||
5 |
What is the nature of the challenge? (What is not adequately addressed at present?) |
O&G operations can have both a positive and negative impact on the local populous. The social aspect of this development can be difficult to track or measure. This may include changes in land use, population density, the displacement of communities/ tribes, etc. |
||||
6 |
Thematic information requirements |
4. Obtain detailed land-use information, 14. Obtain detailed imagery of the surface, |
||||
7 |
Nature of the challenge - What effect does this challenge have on operations? |
Monitoring the social implications of our operations allows us to highlight areas of success and improvement. We hope this will allow us to access greater reserves as we can more clearly articulate the benefits of our operations to future licence holders |
||||
8 |
What do you currently do to address this challenge?/ How is this challenge conventionally addressed? |
Looking at changes against base-line maps. However, base-line maps are often insufficient in detail or date. |
||||
9 |
What kind of solution do you envisage could address this challenge? |
Very high to medium resolution EO data to derive land use information.
Resolution depends on covered area and size of analysis objective |
||||
10 |
What is your view on the capability of technology to meet this need? – are you currently using EO tech? If not, why not? |
|
||||
|
Challenge classification |
|
||||
11 |
Lifecycle stage |
Pre license |
Exp. |
Dev. |
Prod. |
Decom. |
Score from impact quantification [1] |
1 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
|
12 |
Climate classification |
NOT CLIMATE SPECIFIC |
||||
13 |
Geographic context/restrictions |
Generic onshore (Unspecified) |
||||
14 |
Topographic classification / Offshore classification |
Generic onshore (Unspecified) |
||||
15 |
Seasonal variations |
Any season |
||||
16 |
Impact Area |
Social impact |
||||
17 |
Technology Urgency (How quickly does the user need the solution) |
Immediately (0-2 years) |
||||
|
Information requirements |
|
||||
18 |
Update frequency |
|
||||
19 |
Data Currently used |
|
||||
20 |
Spatial resolution |
|
||||
21 |
Thematic accuracy |
|
||||
22 |
Example formats |
|
||||
23 |
Timeliness |
Within a month |
||||
24 |
Geographic Extent |
district area |
||||
25 |
Existing standards |
|
[1] Impact quantification scores: 4 – Critical/ enabling; 3 – Significant/ competitive advantage; 2 – Important but non-essential; 1 – Nice to have; 0 – No impact, need satisfied with existing technology
There is no content with the specified labels