Child pages
  • OTM-078: Remote supervision of operations

 

Remote supervision of operations 

 

Challenge ID

OTM:078

1

Title

Remote supervision of operations

2

Theme ID

ON 5.4: Logistics planning and operations - Monitoring of assets

3

Originator of Challenge

Onshore: OTM

4

Challenge Reviewer / initiator

 

 

General description

Overview of Challenge

5

What is the nature of the challenge? (What is not adequately addressed at present?)

We often sub-contract large workpack elements in remote locations, or locations that are geographically far away from our main offices.

6

Thematic information requirements

9. Obtain detailed imagery of assets,

7

Nature of the challenge - What effect does this challenge have on operations?

It would be beneficial to us to be able to supervise our sub-contractors without the requirement for an on-the-ground representative.  It would help us to ensure, for example, that regulations are being adhered to, logistical activity is occurring as prom

8

What do you currently do to address this challenge?/ How is this challenge conventionally addressed?

We sometimes pay third-parties to validate sub-contractor work.  Otherwise we need to be on site ourselves.

9

What kind of solution do you envisage could address this challenge?

EO data can provide frequent, repeated information on the construction progress and detects delays in the construction phase.

10

What is your view on the capability of technology to meet this need? – are you currently using EO tech? If not, why not?

EO could be a useful complimentary technology.

 

Challenge classification

 

11

Lifecycle stage

Pre license

Exp.

Dev.

Prod.

Decom.

Score from impact quantification [1]

4

4

4

4

4

12

Climate classification

NOT CLIMATE SPECIFIC

13

Geographic context/restrictions

Generic onshore (Unspecified)

14

Topographic classification / Offshore classification

Generic onshore (Unspecified)

15

Seasonal variations

Any season

16

Impact Area

HSE, operational cost reduction and efficiency

17

Technology Urgency

(How quickly does the user need the solution)

Immediately (0-2 years)

 

Information requirements

 

18

Update frequency

As close to real-time as possible

19

Data Currently used

 

20

Spatial resolution

 

21

Thematic accuracy

 

22

Example formats

 

23

Timeliness

As close to real-time as possible

24

Geographic Extent

asset areas / reservoir footprints

25

Existing standards

 


 


[1] Impact quantification scores: 4 – Critical/ enabling; 3 – Significant/ competitive advantage; 2 – Important but non-essential; 1 – Nice to have; 0 – No impact, need satisfied with existing technology