|
Challenge ID |
OTM:049 |
||||
1 |
Title |
Identifying unregulated overhead power cables |
||||
2 |
Theme ID |
ON 5.2: Logistics planning and operations - Support to surveying crews for planning surveys and H&S |
||||
3 |
Originator of Challenge |
Onshore: OTM |
||||
4 |
Challenge Reviewer / initiator |
PEMEX, Petronas |
||||
|
General description |
Overview of Challenge |
||||
5 |
What is the nature of the challenge? (What is not adequately addressed at present?) |
It is not uncommon to find numerous unregulated power cables, and other services lines (water, gas, etc.) in many frontier regions. Whilst damaging a small water pipeline poses little HSE risk, unregulated power cables do pose a threat. It would be beneficial to us to have a tool that could identify the location of over-head power-line routes and allow us to understand the clearance heights. This will influence logistics and H&S considerations such as movement of staff and plant. |
||||
6 |
Thematic information requirements |
4. Obtain detailed land-use information, 14. Obtain detailed imagery of the surface, |
||||
7 |
Nature of the challenge - What effect does this challenge have on operations? |
There have been fatalities as a result of survey staff walking under overhead lines with survey equipment. Where this risk can be totally removed, it should be. Some development equipment have clearance heights that exceed the height of some power cable |
||||
8 |
What do you currently do to address this challenge?/ How is this challenge conventionally addressed? |
Online imagery, ground survey teams |
||||
9 |
What kind of solution do you envisage could address this challenge? |
|
||||
10 |
What is your view on the capability of technology to meet this need? – are you currently using EO tech? If not, why not? |
|
||||
|
Challenge classification |
|
||||
11 |
Lifecycle stage |
Pre license |
Exp. |
Dev. |
Prod. |
Decom. |
Score from impact quantification [1] |
0 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
|
12 |
Climate classification |
NOT CLIMATE SPECIFIC |
||||
13 |
Geographic context/restrictions |
Generic onshore (Unspecified) |
||||
14 |
Topographic classification / Offshore classification |
Generic onshore (Unspecified) |
||||
15 |
Seasonal variations |
Any season |
||||
16 |
Impact Area |
Health and Safety |
||||
17 |
Technology Urgency (How quickly does the user need the solution) |
Immediately (0-2 years) |
||||
|
Information requirements |
|
||||
18 |
Update frequency |
Snap shot requirement |
||||
19 |
Data Currently used |
|
||||
20 |
Spatial resolution |
|
||||
21 |
Thematic accuracy |
|
||||
22 |
Example formats |
|
||||
23 |
Timeliness |
Reference data - timeliness not important |
||||
24 |
Geographic Extent |
district area |
||||
25 |
Existing standards |
|
[1] Impact quantification scores: 4 – Critical/ enabling; 3 – Significant/ competitive advantage; 2 – Important but non-essential; 1 – Nice to have; 0 – No impact, need satisfied with existing technology