Child pages
  • OTM-044: Identifying steep terrain for seismic vehicles

 

 Identifying steep terrain for seismic vehicles

 

Challenge ID

OTM:044

1

Title

Identifying steep terrain for seismic vehicles

2

Theme ID

ON 1.2: Seismic Planning - Identification of adverse terrain for trafficability

3

Originator of Challenge

Onshore: OTM

4

Challenge Reviewer / initiator

Statoil, BP, Shell, Ardan-Africa, Eni, Exxon, Tullow, Petronas

 

General description

Overview of Challenge

5

What is the nature of the challenge? (What is not adequately addressed at present?)

We need to identify slopes to avoid roll-over of seismic vehicles

6

Thematic information requirements

1. Obtain detailed topographic information,

7

Nature of the challenge - What effect does this challenge have on operations?

This information can be used in conjunction with, for example, our emergency action plan or the locating of assets or infrastructure

 

8

What do you currently do to address this challenge?/ How is this challenge conventionally addressed?

Online imagery can be used but it does not show changes in elevation particularly clearly.  LiDAR data can be obtained or ground survey teams can be deployed.

9

What kind of solution do you envisage could address this challenge?

 

10

What is your view on the capability of technology to meet this need? – are you currently using EO tech? If not, why not?

 

 

Challenge classification

 

11

Lifecycle stage

Pre license

Exp.

Dev.

Prod.

Decom.

Score from impact quantification [1]

2

3

0

0

0

12

Climate classification

NOT CLIMATE SPECIFIC

13

Geographic context/restrictions

Generic onshore (Unspecified)

14

Topographic classification / Offshore classification

Generic onshore (Unspecified)

15

Seasonal variations

Any season

16

Impact Area

Health and Safety

17

Technology Urgency

(How quickly does the user need the solution)

Immediately (0-2 years)

 

Information requirements

 

18

Update frequency

 

19

Data Currently used

 

20

Spatial resolution

 

21

Thematic accuracy

 

22

Example formats

 

23

Timeliness

Reference data - timeliness not important

24

Geographic Extent

district area

25

Existing standards

 


 


[1] Impact quantification scores: 4 – Critical/ enabling; 3 – Significant/ competitive advantage; 2 – Important but non-essential; 1 – Nice to have; 0 – No impact, need satisfied with existing technology