Child pages
  • OTM-008: Determine historical ground movement for infrastructure planning

 

Determine historical ground movement for infrastructure planning

 

Challenge ID

OTM:008

1

Title

Determine historical ground movement for infrastructure planning

2

Theme ID

ON 3.2: Subsidence monitoring - Infrastructure monitoring

3

Originator of Challenge

Onshore: OTM

4

Challenge Reviewer / initiator

BP, Statoil, PetroSA, Petronas

 

General description

Overview of Challenge

5

What is the nature of the challenge? (What is not adequately addressed at present?)

Use of historic ground movement data can influence infrastructure planning, through identification of ground movement trends, etc.  It is important to know to what extent and in which direction the is ground moving, before any building/extraction occurs.

6

Thematic information requirements

1. Obtain detailed topographic information,            13. Monitor ground movement,

7

Nature of the challenge - What effect does this challenge have on operations?

Influencing infrastructure planning

8

What do you currently do to address this challenge?/ How is this challenge conventionally addressed?

Optical imagery is used

9

What kind of solution do you envisage could address this challenge?

Historical SAR data acquired over areas where infrastructure is planned can be analysed to produce historical ground movement maps. Areas of subsidence / uplift can be identified and avoid when in the planning phase.

10

What is your view on the capability of technology to meet this need? – are you currently using EO tech? If not, why not?

EO could be a useful complimentary technology

 

Challenge classification

 

11

Lifecycle stage

Pre license

Exp.

Dev.

Prod.

Decom.

Score from impact quantification [1]

3

3

3

0

1

12

Climate classification

NOT CLIMATE SPECIFIC

13

Geographic context/restrictions

Generic onshore (Unspecified)

14

Topographic classification / Offshore classification

Generic onshore (Unspecified)

15

Seasonal variations

Any season

16

Impact Area

Infrastructure planning

17

Technology Urgency

(How quickly does the user need the solution)

Immediately (0-2 years)

 

Information requirements

 

18

Update frequency

One off historic

19

Data Currently used

 

20

Spatial resolution

 

21

Thematic accuracy

 

22

Example formats

GIS Shape file

23

Timeliness

Within six months

24

Geographic Extent

Development area only

25

Existing standards

No industry standards.  TRE have their own internal INSAR standards


 


[1] Impact quantification scores: 4 – Critical/ enabling; 3 – Significant/ competitive advantage; 2 – Important but non-essential; 1 – Nice to have; 0 – No impact, need satisfied with existing technology

 

There is no content with the specified labels