Global requirements on EO products
CLS_OFF.6.1 : Global requirements on EO products
1 |
Challenge ID |
CLS_OFF.6.1 |
||||
2 |
Title |
Global requirements on EO products |
||||
3 |
Originator of Challenge |
All contacts |
||||
|
General description |
|
||||
4 |
What data/products do you currently use ? |
n/a |
||||
5 |
When do you use this kind of dataset? |
n/a |
||||
6 |
What are your actual limitations and do you have a work around? |
|
||||
7 |
Needs and expectations on EO data |
Workshops with ESA to communicate on these tools (validation case studies) and the reliability of these products could be very useful. A new analyze of the climate change with the EO data could also be of a great help. CRYOSAT Data are really needed for operational issues. Communication about these products needs to be done. There is also a need to communicate more upstream with the science community |
||||
|
Challenge classification |
|
||||
8
|
Lifecycle stage |
Pre license |
Exp. |
Dev. |
Prod. |
Decom. |
Score from impact |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
9 |
Geographic context/restrictions |
n/a |
||||
10 |
Topographic classification / Offshore classification |
n/a |
||||
11 |
Activity impacted/concerned |
Main advantage (besides money saving): standardizing of the data, same reference, same standards for every O&G plateform studies. Data homogeneity among all operators to represent the environment and relation with regulatory bodies, continuity on calibration. |
||||
12 |
Urgency (How quickly does the user need the solution) |
n/a |
||||
|
Information requirements |
|
||||
13 |
Update frequency |
n/a |
||||
14 |
Temporal resolution |
n/a |
||||
15 |
Spatial resolution |
n/a |
||||
16 |
Data quality |
n/a |
||||
17 |
Data Coverage and extent |
More easy access to some area outside the limitation [52°N-52° S]. |
||||
18 |
Example formats |
n/a |
||||
19 |
Timeliness |
n/a |
||||
20 |
Existing standards |
n/a |
There is no content with the specified labels