Pollution monitoring
CLS_OFF.4.2 : Pollution monitoring
1 |
Challenge ID |
CLS_OFF.4.2 |
||||
2 |
Title |
Pollution monitoring |
||||
3 |
Originator of Challenge |
SHELL/Statoil |
||||
|
General description |
|
||||
4 |
What data/products do you currently use ? |
|
||||
5 |
When do you use this kind of dataset? |
In case of a leak, the drift of the oil spill need to be simulated and estimated. Satellite images can also be used to note the pollution. |
||||
6 |
What are your actual limitations and do you have a work around? |
n/a |
||||
7 |
Needs and expectations on EO data |
• Synoptic data, more data at low latitudes • Better coordination between satellite missions for a better coverage • Oil spill classification & thickness (EnviSAT was very usefull, good expectations from the Sentinels) |
||||
|
Challenge classification |
|
||||
8
|
Lifecycle stage |
Pre license |
Exp. |
Dev. |
Prod. |
Decom. |
Score from impact |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
9 |
Geographic context/restrictions |
|
||||
10 |
Topographic classification / Offshore classification |
n/a |
||||
11 |
Activity impacted/concerned |
n/a |
||||
12 |
Urgency (How quickly does the user need the solution) |
As soon possible for oil spill
|
||||
|
Information requirements |
|
||||
13 |
Update frequency |
Oil spill: Daily update minimum higher if possible 4 times a day.
|
||||
14 |
Temporal resolution |
n/a |
||||
15 |
Spatial resolution |
1m-30m for oil spill response and monitoring. |
||||
16 |
Data quality |
Near the cost: higher requirements |
||||
17 |
Data Coverage and extent |
Composite mostly Composite, single sensor |
||||
18 |
Example formats |
Ascii tables, Geotiffs for operations (It depends on the context) |
||||
19 |
Timeliness |
As soon as possible
|
||||
20 |
Existing standards |
Some but very broad |
There is no content with the specified labels