Evaluation of the efficiency of the structure
CLS_OFF.3.3 : evaluation of the efficiency of the structure
1 |
Challenge ID |
CLS_OFF.3.3 |
||||||||||||||||||
2 |
Title |
Evaluation of the efficiency of the structure |
||||||||||||||||||
3 |
Originator of Challenge |
SHELL/BMT |
||||||||||||||||||
|
General description |
|
||||||||||||||||||
4 |
What data/products do you currently use ? |
|
||||||||||||||||||
5 |
When do you use this kind of dataset? |
These data and products are mainly used during design phases. Some data are used in specific cases, for example: • Air temperature above the sea: for design to evaluate the efficiency of pumps of FPSO (Floating production storage and offloading) • Solar radiation: to evaluate the efficiency of platforms in the Middle East. • Tair, SST, rainfall, cloud cover/lightning, wind, current, wave are needed il all phases of the project and mainly during development to evaluate the efficiency of the structure. Wind and wave data are useful to evaluate buoyancy perturbation |
||||||||||||||||||
6 |
What are your actual limitations and do you have a work around? |
n/a |
||||||||||||||||||
7 |
Needs and expectations on EO data |
Air temperature and wind fields above land could be good to have thanks to EO data. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Challenge classification |
|
||||||||||||||||||
8
|
Lifecycle stage |
Pre license |
Exp. |
Dev. |
Prod. |
Decom. |
||||||||||||||
Score from impact |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
9 |
Geographic context/restrictions |
|
||||||||||||||||||
10 |
Topographic classification / Offshore classification |
All topographic classifications Profiles are always needed, as well as the deep sea currents. |
||||||||||||||||||
11 |
Activity impacted/concerned |
Money saving |
||||||||||||||||||
12 |
Urgency (How quickly does the user need the solution) |
The capability of having wind fields above the land and Tair above water would also be useful. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Information requirements |
|
||||||||||||||||||
13 |
Update frequency |
SAR: 2 images per day would be good Metocean data : OK for the time being |
||||||||||||||||||
14 |
Temporal resolution |
|
||||||||||||||||||
15 |
Spatial resolution |
For offshore a resolution of 20 – 25 km is OK. The main difficulties are located on coastal area. |
||||||||||||||||||
16 |
Data quality |
Ok for the time being |
||||||||||||||||||
17 |
Data Coverage and extent |
Perhaps more easy access to some area outside the limitation [52°N-52° S]. |
||||||||||||||||||
18 |
Example formats |
Matlab or Fortran would be fine. But most important, the tools to read the products are needed. |
||||||||||||||||||
19 |
Timeliness |
Ok for the time being |
||||||||||||||||||
20 |
Existing standards |
Matlab or Fortran |
Content by label
There is no content with the specified labels
There is no content with the specified labels