Coastal morphology
CLS_OFF.3.2 : Coastal morphology
|
1 |
Challenge ID |
CLS_OFF.3.2 |
||||
|
2 |
Title |
Coastal morphology |
||||
|
3 |
Originator of Challenge |
SAIPEM |
||||
|
|
General description |
|
||||
|
4 |
What data/products do you currently use ? |
Satellite images of coastline (historical images) |
||||
|
5 |
When do you use this kind of dataset? |
Mainly during the design of structures |
||||
|
6 |
What are your actual limitations and do you have a work around? |
The main limitation is the spatial resolution of images which is sometime larger than the expected variations of the shoreline position |
||||
|
7 |
Needs and expectations on EO data |
Improved spatial resolution |
||||
|
|
Challenge classification |
|
||||
|
8
|
Lifecycle stage |
Pre license |
Exp. |
Dev. |
Prod. |
Decom. |
|
Score from impact |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
9 |
Geographic context/restrictions |
All over the world |
||||
|
10 |
Topographic classification / Offshore classification |
Coastal areas |
||||
|
11 |
Activity impacted/concerned |
H&S benefit; Due diligence tool; Operational cost reduction |
||||
|
12 |
Urgency (How quickly does the user need the solution) |
3 – immediate (0-2 yrs) |
||||
|
|
Information requirements |
|
||||
|
13 |
Update frequency |
Every 2 months |
||||
|
14 |
Temporal resolution |
Not appropriate |
||||
|
15 |
Spatial resolution |
1m |
||||
|
16 |
Data quality |
n/a |
||||
|
17 |
Data Coverage and extent |
Geo-stationnary |
||||
|
18 |
Example formats |
Text, excel, GEOTIFF, GIS…format is not a problem |
||||
|
19 |
Timeliness |
2 weeks |
||||
|
20 |
Existing standards |
Yes, quality systems in place internally |
||||