Page tree

Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.



View file
nameRheticus Safeway.pdf
page1 – No Poverty
height150


EO Products/Services supporting the SDGs

View file
nameRheticus Building Check.pdf
page1 – No Poverty
height150




View file
nameRSS.pdf
page1 – No Poverty
height150

View file
nameAgroApps.pdf
page1 – No Poverty
height150


View file
nameSpaceSur.pdf
page1 – No Poverty
height150

View file
nameDHI_flood metrics.pdf
page1 – No Poverty
height150

View file
namePlanetek_illegal waste monitoring.pdf
page1 – No Poverty
height150

View file
nameNEO_informal settlement mapping.pdf
page1 – No Poverty
height150

View file
nameRheticus Safeland.pdf
page1 – No Poverty
height150


View file
nameGMV_damage assessment.pdf
page1 – No Poverty
height150


View file
nameRheticus Wildfires.pdf
page1 – No Poverty
height150

View file
nameMayday.pdf
page1 – No Poverty
height150

View file
nameSatellogic (SDGs 2,7,9,11,13,15, crossSDGs)_Earth Observation for land monitoring and disaster response.pdf
page1 – No Poverty
height150


View file
namemayday_disaster risk_1.pdf
page1 – No Poverty
height150

View file
namePlanetek Italia (Rheticus Agriculture) (SDGs 1,2,6,13).pdf
page1 – No Poverty
height150

View file
nameRST_riskrelay.pdf
page1 – No Poverty
height150


View file
namespottitt_habitat classification.pdf
page1 – No Poverty
height150

View file
namespottitt_habitat classification50cm.pdf
page1 – No Poverty
height150

View file
namespottitt_loss of green space.pdf
page1 – No Poverty
height150


View file
namee-geos_building displacement monitoring.pdf
page1 – No Poverty
height150

View file
nameGIM_informal settlement AI toolchain_1.pdf
page1 – No Poverty
height150

Goal: End

hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture

poverty in all its forms everywhere.


EO data offer an invaluable opportunity for better-informing development policies and quantifying various targets. How can EO be used to help countries achieve specific targets? Source: ESA compendium of EO contributions to the SDG Targets and Indicators

Target

2

1.

3

1: By 2030,

double the agricultural productivity and incomes of small-scale food producers, in particular women, indigenous peoples, family farmers, pastoralists and fishers, including through secure and equal access to land, other productive resources and inputs, knowledge, financial services, markets and opportunities for value addition and non-farm employment.

Smallholder farmers play a key role in global food production, particularly in developing countries. Is estimated that small-scale farming systems provide up to 80 percent of the food supply in Asian and sub-Saharan Africa. These systems usually host the majority of poor and hungry people worldwide. Therefore, increasing agricultural productivity in these systems would be key to achieve food security.

Even though EO has been proven potentially useful to contribute to the management of farming, pastoral and forestry systems at regional scales, particularly by generating data to feed crop simulation models and early warning systems, it still has limitations to provide the type of fine scale data needed to feed models operating at the farm scale. This is mainly due to the need for high spatial and temporal resolution and repeat monitoring on demand, which satellites cannot yet guarantee (Jin et al. 2018, Kasampalis et al. 2018). The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation Lidar (GEDI), to be launched in 2018, is expected to produce promising data to fill this gap, at least for forestry systems.

Further efforts are needed in order to implement ways to put the information derived from crop simulation models and early warning systems in the hands of small-scale food producers, as required by this target. Recent pilot cases suggest that information derived from EO, such as weather forecasts, can be made accessible to small-scale food producers even in isolated areas in a way that can inform crop management decisions, such as the time to plant and crop variety selection (UNDP, 2016).

eradicate extreme poverty for all people everywhere, currently measured as people living on less than $1.25 a day.

(eo services focus on: Mapping spatial distribution of risk of poverty)

Target 1.2: By 2030, reduce at least by half the proportion of men, women and children of all ages living in poverty in all its dimensions according to national definitions.

Earth Observation (EO) data can be used to track and target poverty, and aid the allocation of scarce resources which can help improve human livelihoods. EO can be used to map spatial distribution of socioeconomic deprivations, as well as providing information that may indicate areas at risk of poverty (e.g. contribute towards famine early warning systems) (NASA, 2018). EO data can be used to forecast weather, monitor fires, determine populations at risk from flooding/landslides, analyse climate change and map land cover change (e.g. deforestation and degradation). These factors can all help identify areas currently at risk from poverty, and in the future.

Satellite images can also be used to estimate economic activity (e.g. through monitoring night lights) and mapping houses (e.g. slums), which can be identified through satellite images using physical parameters, clustering of structures with or without a road network, irregular and haphazardly grouped temporary, poorly-constructed or semi-permanent households (Montana et al., 2016). Further, these datasets can be combined with in-field survey data (from socioeconomic household surveys, social media, mobile phone networks) (Leidig & Teeuw, 2015), and often by additionally using machine learning algorithms (Jean et al., 2016), can estimate consumption expenditure and asset wealth of the region analysed. Such approaches can assist efforts to track and target poverty.

(eo services focus on: Estimate economic activity, mapping areas and its resources)


Target 1.4: By 2030, ensure that all men and women, in particular the poor and the vulnerable, have equal rights to economic resources, as well as access to basic services, ownership and control over land and other forms of property, inheritance, natural resources, appropriate new technology and financial services, including microfinance.

Improving human well-being and access to services, EO data can help develop various proxy indicators of human well-being, for example access to services such as electric power, as well as patterns of human interaction

Remote sensing and call data records can help monitor access to basic services. Call Data Records (CDR) provide information on where, when, how and with whom someone made a mobile phone call – mainly used for billing purposes, but also provide spatial information on patterns of human interaction. Mobile phone usage and movement can indicate household access to financial resources and services, for example, via electronic money schemes such as M-Pesa. Remote sensing can capture information on biophysical properties such as rainfall, temperature and vegetation cover as well to variables such as infrastructure (e.g. railway, main roads, waterways), distance to water sources and power plants, electricity use, agriculture productivity and distance to roads and urban areas (which reflects access to markets and information). The state of the road network (e.g. if it’s a dirt track or an impervious road) can be derived through Open Street Map, but can be combined with remote sensing data to provide a more detailed picture.

(eo services focus on: Estimate economic activity and access to basic services)


Target 1.5: By 2030, build the resilience of the poor and those in vulnerable situations and reduce their exposure and vulnerability to climate-related extreme events and other economic, social and environmental shocks and disasters.

The frequency and severity of natural disasters have been increasing in the last decades. Research has revealed that it is generally the poor who tend to suffer worst from disasters. The fact that climate change is expected to increase the frequency and intensity of these events threaten to derail international efforts to eradicate poverty.

The importance of EO in disaster management and assessment has gained increasing significance over the past years. One of the ways EO can contribute to build resilience of vulnerable populations is through disaster-risk reduction. EO datasets and methods can contribute to disaster risk management and reduction by providing relevant information to the full cycle of disaster and environmental shock management: mitigation, preparedness, warning and response.

EO has proven successful for a wide range of disaster types, particularly for flooding, extreme drought events, earthquakes, landslides and volcanic eruptions. In fact, EO data is providing a reliable data basis for deriving useful information such as the extent of damaged area along with the land-use types as well as the population affected. This can be done through hazard mapping and risk modelling, real time monitoring, producing input data for feeding early warning systems, or for producing maps to support disaster response actions. For a comprehensive review on how EO can contribute to disaster-risk management, see ESA (2015). EO data lies also at the heart of climate modelling, which represent key tools to inform actions aiming to reduce vulnerability to climate change.

(eo services focus on: Build resilience of vulnerable populations contributing to management of disaster risk reduction. Indicator 1.5.2: Disaster Damage

As this indicator is classified as Tier 3, no internationally established methodology or standards are yet available.

(eo services focus on Management of farming)

Target 2.4: By 2030, ensure sustainable food production systems and implement resilient agricultural practices that increase productivity and production, that help maintain ecosystems, that strengthen capacity for adaptation to climate change, extreme weather, drought, flooding and other disasters and that progressively improve land and soil quality.

Continuing population and consumption growth is likely to increase the global demand for food in the next decades. The achievement of food security will require profound changes in the global food and agriculture system. At the same time, unsustainable agriculture expansion has created numerous environmental problems, such as soil erosion, water pollution as well as greenhouse gases emissions. This target aims to contribute to this goal by increasing the economic, social and environmental sustainability of agricultural practices, including through enhancing the resilience to climate change and extreme whether events.

EO methods can play an important role in increasing agricultural productivity as well as minimising the environmental impact of the agricultural sector. Some of the ways EO has proven successful to contribute to increase the sustainability of agricultural production include: (1) yield estimation, (2) vegetation vigour and drought stress monitoring, (3) assessment of crop phenological development, (4) crop acreage estimation and cropland mapping and (5) mapping of disturbances and land use/land cover (LULC) changes (Atzberger, 2014). EO datasets can also be used by countries to inform spatial land use planning and minimize the potential environmental impact of crop expansion through optimizing the allocation of lands (Laurence et al. 2014). In addition to crops, satellite remote sensing techniques can also be applied for rangeland monitoring and management (Ali et al. 2016). EO data and methods can be useful for assessing the future exposure to climate change as well as to extreme weather events, as explained in the 1.5.2 indicator factsheet.

(eo services focus on Agricultural productivity & env. impact of agriculture. Indicator 2.4.1: Sustainable agriculture

)


Relevant Success Stories

Content by Label
showLabelsfalse
showSpacefalse
cqllabel = "sdg2"